A Canadian musician claims that U.S. Customs officials seized and destroyed 11 rare flutes as he passed through New York’s John F. Kennedy International Airport last week. The reason? Concerns they were an ecological threat.
The government disputes the claims, arguing that they merely destroyed random bamboo stalks, but that isn’t really the point. The real questioned the situation begs is when the Artist’s right goes too far. Personally, I think that if the story proves true, the government officials were out of line. However, what’s your opinion? Given how far artist’s rights have been allowed to extend in the past, where should the line be drawn? Art denigrating religious beliefs has been permitted. Racist and fairly Vulgar works have been permitted. Is a minor potential threat to ecology more heinous? What’s your opinion?