“Art Exhibits for the Selfie Set”
by Richard Morgan via “Wall Street Journal“
The exhibit, of sculptures and paintings by the artist KAWS, isn’t . . . .”
“Art Exhibits for the Selfie Set”
by Richard Morgan via “Wall Street Journal“
The exhibit, of sculptures and paintings by the artist KAWS, isn’t . . . .”


*********************************************************************************************
You can buy his recommended books in the United States here:
Alan Sorrell: The Life and Works of an English Neo-Romantic Artist

The government disputes the claims, arguing that they merely destroyed random bamboo stalks, but that isn’t really the point. The real questioned the situation begs is when the Artist’s right goes too far. Personally, I think that if the story proves true, the government officials were out of line. However, what’s your opinion? Given how far artist’s rights have been allowed to extend in the past, where should the line be drawn? Art denigrating religious beliefs has been permitted. Racist and fairly Vulgar works have been permitted. Is a minor potential threat to ecology more heinous? What’s your opinion?